Komal Dhiman & ANR v. State Of Haryana &ANR




    
      Date of decision: 14th May, 2015  Komal Dhiman and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another  Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Sutikshan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr. Bhavnik Mehta, Advocate and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2.

 
!"

# Reply on behalf of respondent No.2 has been filed in the Court. The same is taken on record.

It is submitted by learned State counsel on instructions from SI Balwan Singh, Police Station Naraingarh that both the petitioners namely Komal Dhiman and Saurav Dhiman have been RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.15 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    found innocent during investigations and have been placed in column No.2 and that challan has already been filed. The present petition thus, having been rendered infructuous stands dismissed.

"

 
#   $%! &
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.15 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court