Parmod Aneja v. Jatinder Kumar, Estate Officer

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh C.O.C.P. No. 1093 of 2022 Date of Decision: 20.07.2022 Parmod Aneja ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Jatinder Kumar ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Karan Garg, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for punishing the respondent for disobeying the order dated 01.08.2007, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T. Chandigarh. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986, enables the authorities constituted thereunder to implement its orders. In any case, this petition has been filed after a period of 15 years.

2.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is disposed of by relegating the petitioner to the alternative remedy. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge July 20, 2022 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.07.22 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document