Manoj Kumar & ANR v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-43283 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 11, 2017 Manoj Kumar and another

...Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Jitender Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Siddharth Sanwara, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

Mr.Rose Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.477 dated 28.07.2016 under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Hisar.

Notice of motion was issued and learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant appeared. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. The petitioners have already joined the investigation. They are Vineet Gulati 2017.01.12 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh not required for interrogation or investigation purposes. Learned counsel

CRM No.M-43283 of 2016 -2for the complainant as well as learned State counsel, on the instructions of Investigating Officer, stated that the parties have effected compromise. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case where petitioners are entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, finding merit in the present petition, the same is allowed. The order dated 03.12.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioners is made absolute. January 11, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.01.12 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh