← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/12167/2022allowed

Ravi Kumar And Others v. The Canara Bank And Others

2025-12-23Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil12 pages

     

 

 

  



   !

" # 

$  $ "$   # 

$

$ $  

 %&  $ $    & 

         

      ! ""    # 

 $ % $    &

'

(! !



  

$'$((

  



  



)*

#  

 

    





  



)*    $

!! !  

 +



   



(   ,,-),,.

(  

/  ! !   

 + +

     

!

   ,1 ,2,23 45$.6 ,7 ,2,2 45$16

 )*+,-./0 1/2 3/0,.4+25-./0 ,

Whether an indifferent treatment under the title part time sweepers in the absence of such discrimination of part time or full time sweepers in the regulations especially in the light of settlement dated 28.02.2020 under Section 18(1) read with Section 2(p) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 sustain in law? 53-*56 75-2.8 /1 -9+ 35,+



   $ 

       2.

2'

,2$, 

   ,  $1 2$ ,2$.

 8 ,.

,2$.

 % 2$ ,2$2 /  

!!  5  722

₹ '22

9

 +   + 5

!   ',')5

+ 

     ,% ,22-3 45$6 + 

+ * 



      +

458$8 2'

,2$8

%

:+       !  3 6 

    

 +   *    !      2$ 2% ,2$'  3 4  5$,6  !

 !



  /;    

+ + !











  

+ <=

 

 

        !+        +       (   ,1-)2217);9/>;3?6    ,, ,22'    *(  (    28%5,22-5*(5 <>;

'

!

+,8 2$ ,2$.     



 + / !!



 / 

+ 5  

 

  72

 + 

+    ,, ,2$.

#   !

 + 

! 

 +,2$1@$7,2$7@,2

-

=,1 ,2,2 

+ *  + *A +BC



$1 

,3

/ ;

 $7%.

 



  5      <  55       5

 !



 +    +  5    

* 2$ ,2,2  

5 <  55 

.

  

2% ,2,23 45$76  

/   

 >*

/ ! 

+ * (*   

 !  +

  (*





;

     

   

    

    +   2, 2% ,2,,,8 ,2,,,% 2'

,2,,,8 ,2,8  +  

 

 



  8$ 2'

,2,, :+

 !



  ,7 ,2,8  

+



82 2.

,2,%

 

    ,% ,22-3 45$62.

2% ,2$%3 45,6  ,1 ,2,2+  

  5   5

(   !

!  

!  

  +

( 

/0-+0-./0,

:+9561 /1 -9+ ;+-.-./0+2, $2

/    

 

 !

 

 ,% ,22-3 45$6 + A

+ *



  "   :

!      $$

D 

 

     



 

 

  

 +,2,,  < !  +

 

  

7 22 '

22    !

+!

 +$)8!

> ',')5 +

 :

. 7  >    

 $8 2'

,2$83 4586



  

+ *  !    +

 ! !   !+E   F /  !  

 

   !

   !+

+

+   

+

 ,8 2$ ,2$.

 !  +!

 



     5



     

)22'

,2$.2, ,2$.3 45 'G5-  +6

$,

D 

  

(       (     <=)<>;)<> ;)

),2'$    ,, ,2$.   <=)<>;)<> ;)

)$8$-28 $2 ,2$. 



+

!   

 + 

 <  

 +   *            2$ 2% ,2$'        !

       +

  !   ,% ,22-        

 !!

!)  !       

 

+

)  

 !



 



( 

45$, $8

D                       $- $2 ,2$'3 45$86



  

 

   

&

+ &  

   

   

    45///   

 =         ,% $2 ,2$73 45$%6  

 

  !

+,2$15$7 

1 8H  

+

* 

$7-'

 !



 $%



+  

+ ,$ 2$ ,2,23 45$-6



   

(     

 

     

     ,1 ,2,2 45$.6    ! + *  +C

: 

 &  <  55  ! 

 $'



! 

  



!

!

 

!

+ * (* 

2% ,2,23 45$76

 

 2$ 2% ,2,2 !

  +

)(* / !  

   + *C





 +  

< 5 55 

 

,1 ,2,23 45$.6

 

 

&    

* ,$ ,2,2  < 5 55  ! 

(

>   !

+



 * 

+,2$.5 $1,2$15$7,2$75,2,2,25,$,2,$5,,  



   +  +    82+ *  

  45$%G5$' 

$-

D+ ! 

:+ +  !

< B< !

( 



>  I 

  (?5$2$'-5,2,$    ,- ,2,$  3 4  5,26         

 

!

       !

       

         

 

 

:+9561 /1 2+,;/04+0-,<50= $.

=  

 

)*   !          

    !!  +        

 +  +!   : 

       !!

 +!       $1

       

          !    !

    



)    

)*      

    5



  +! 

 !



   +



  +     

)* 

     !!  <       

!

    

  +

 

+! 



:

 +   

  +

+ !

 !

(  

*

4(  +

" C;

$7

< ! !  ,% ,22-!

  + 

+ *  





+ + 

 

   



     



   



   ,2

   

     !  

 



+&     

  

)!

          

+ 

 A

 + *

+   

 

)* ,$

/    

)

  ,8 2$ ,2$.

+ 

,'

2$ ,2$%

+



&     

( ,,

   

     + ,'

2$ ,2$%  !

A

  +   *       +   *B   +  C

   +    

   

(+

!    

(



 0

  +

,8

 ! + 

    ,%

<



> 056?,., ,'





(  4   

*     



 !      ,1 ,2,2     :   

     

 

   

    E 5    F    !+

   

+ + 

+5  

  +   ,1 ,2,23 45$.6  /; 

/0-.0*.-?

/1 $+2@.3+ 5-*2+ /1 0A5A+7+0- ,-

/   

    

+!

.   $'+

+

    

!!  +     5 



 722

'22

  !  5

  +  &   

              

  

  

+



,.

    +   

 !



  ! 

!  +    !



E

+F E 5 F +!

  

 A +

 

 !+ +  !

 + 

    

!

+

 ! +



  !! !

,1

/   !  +

    5 

 + ! 

B 

 +!!!  +

B 11+3- .04.0A 5-*2+ /1 $+--6+7+045-+4 >    ,7

      ,1 ,2,23 4  5$.6      

$13$6 

,3 6

/ ;

 $7%.    !

    

 +  *     ! 0  +B

 

+ 

 



5   5 <  55  5

 5!

 

$13$6

/;       + !

 !

+    ! +  

E 5   FE  5  F



  =

 +  

*          4

       

 

         +      +

8$

 !

+ *  (* 

*

 





 + / 4  !      

       !

  

     & 

      +  

      

    !  

  

     

!

    

 

8,

 

   



   !+  !,2$.@$1,2$1@$7,2$7@,2,2,2@,$,2,$@,,

C +

*  $7-'  + +  +

 

  82+ +

 

< !  !   +         +    4 !

 

4! +





 

+

+ 

+ !+

 !

    

      +  +

8%

  +

 !

  (  E  

  

  

   +    

 !

   +   

   

 

 

 

  



  + ?

  

!! 

 + 

      !

 /              !        +     4

     +  

+ ! 

+  

     

+  > !

 "10. Having given careful consideration to the submissions advanced and the material on record, we find that the appellants' long and uninterrupted service, for periods extending well beyond ten years, cannot be brushed aside merely by labelling their initial appointments as part-time or contractual. The essence of their employment must be considered in the light of their sustained contribution, the integral nature of their work, and the fact that no evidence suggests their entry was through any illegal or surreptitious route." 8'



!

 

  



+  +  !

    : +   

 

 :+

 

 

 +   5 



+  

 !  

+ 



E 5  

 8-

( :+ !

    !

 



 !  !!

 +





    

  !"#$% &'

8.

B  (!&')&& * &"+ $ ,      !   4

  +  

 !+  +  :   !! : !  ! (-

&&  .

    Uma Devi (supra) 

 !

04



  +  

!

  !!  !5 !  +   ! + > !

 "19. It is evident from the foregoing that the appellants' roles were not only essential but also indistinguishable from those of regular employees. Their sustained contributions over extended periods, coupled with absence of any adverse record, warrant equitable treatment and regularization of their services. Denial of this benefit, followed by their arbitrary termination, amounts to manifest injustice and must be rectified.

20. It is well established that the decision in Uma Devi (supra) does not intend to penalize employees who have rendered long years of service fulfilling ongoing and necessary functions of the State or its instrumentalities. The said judgment sought to prevent backdoor entries and illegal appointments that circumvent constitutional requirements."

/ 

!! !



+ 

+ !      

+ 

 !!  E5

+F  



 /036*,./0

/    

          + 

         !

    ,7 ,2,2  3 4  5$.6  

  (    

      

 

 +   +     

 !

   +



 ! 

 +   !

      

,1 ,2,23 45$.6  ,7 ,2,23 45$16

   4 

 



%  



 



+



%2

  !+ 

     !

Meenu

$    &  

1. Whether speaking/reasoned?

:Yes/No

2. Whether reportable?

:Yes/No