Raj Pal Sekhon v. State Of Haryana And ANR.




    
       Date of decision: 15th May, 2015  Raj Pal Sekhon

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for Mr. T.C. Dhanwal, Advocate for the complainant.

 !
"#  $ As per the report dated 05.05.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurgaon parties have failed to put in appearance to make statements in spite of the specific directions to this effect. In view of the aforesaid and for this adamant attitude of the petitioner, the petition stands dismissed.

#  !
$   %&" 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.15 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court