← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/42642/2014disposed of

Amrita And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

2015-03-31Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan1 pages



          Date of decision: 31st March, 2015  Amrita and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others  Respondents            1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.  Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.  

  !"

#   It is submitted by the learned State counsel that the petitioners have made statements before the police that they no more require protection as per their prayer made in the present petition and which fact is not controverted by the petitioners' counsel Mr. Sachin Gupta and in view of which the matter has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

"

  #   $%&'( ! )  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.31 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court