Bikram Singh v. Paramjit Kaur

FAO-M-151 of 2002 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-M-151 of 2002 Date of Order: 24.12.2015 Bikram Singh ..Appellant

Versus

Paramjit Kaur ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL

Present:

None for the appellant.

RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) The appellant, filed an appeal, challenging judgment and decree, dated 06.11.2001, dismissing his petition for grant of a decree of divorce.

The appeal came up for hearing on 05.07.2002 and the following order was passed:- "The delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned. There is a delay of 64 days in filing the appeal.

Notice of this application to the respondent. To be listed after the service is complete."

A perusal of the order reveals that notice was issued in the application for condonation of delay and the application was directed to be listed after service is complete.

The notice issued for effecting service upon the respondent was received back with the report, dated 30.07.2002, that the respondent is residing in her in-law's house in Khanpur Bangey. The appellant has not taken any further steps to serve the respondent. NARESH KUMAR 2016.01.05 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

FAO-M-151 of 2002 -2The report appears to suggest that parties have resolved their dispute and are residing together. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal, for non-prosecution.

[ RAJIVE BHALLA ] JUDGE 24.12.2015 [ REKHA MITTAL ] nt JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2016.01.05 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh