Raman Uppal v. C.B.I. And ORS
CRM-M No.42797 of 2017 Raman Uppal v.
CBI & others
Present:
Mr. S.S. Panag, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate for respondent No.1/CBI with Inspector Rupesh Srivastava.
Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl. Solicitor Gen. of India with Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Counsel Govt. of India for respondents No.2 and 3.
Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for respondent No.4 . Mr. J.S. Walia, Sr. Dy. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.5/State.
Mr. R.S. Athwal, Advocate for respondents No.6, 9 & 10. Mr. Pradeep Virk, Advocate for respondents No.7 & 8. ***** Separate replies on behalf of respondents No.1, 2, and 3 have been filed in the Court by respective counsels. The same are taken on record.
Mr. J.S. Walia, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab submits that since the matter is being investigated by the SIT headed by CBI officers, he does not intend to file any reply on behalf of respondent No.5/State.
Let arguments be heard.
(Fateh Deep Singh) Judge January 25, 2018 rps Rattan Pal Singh 2018.02.02 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court