Satish Kmar Etc. v. State Of Hy.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5788-2005 Date of decision: 12.09.2024 Satish Kumar and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****
Present:
Mr. R.K. Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Armaan Dahiya, Advocate for respondent Nos.4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23 and 29.
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1.
Prayer made in the present case for seeking quashing of selection of private respondents as drivers, might not be surviving due to efflux of time. 2.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 12.09.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No HAMANT 2024.09.13 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment