Parveen Kumar & ORS v. State Of Haryana




    
    

   Date of decision: 19th May, 2015  Parveen Kumar and others

Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another

Respondents  !  "#  $
  $
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.

 $
%

#  Report dated 09.03.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sohna has been received on the basis of statements of accused/petitioners Parveen Kumar husband, Chet Ram father4in4law and Maya Devi mother4in4law as well as the complainant Urmila whereby the Court has shown its satisfaction that the parties have arrived at a compromise and thereafter they have started living together.

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure matrimonial dispute and the fact that the parties have since then RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.19 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    started living together coupled with the fact that compromise has gone a long way in ironing out differences and strengthening the matrimonial cord, the prayer made in this petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.67 dated 22.03.2013 registered at Police Station Bhondsi, District Gurgaon under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 377 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

 $
    &' %

(
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.19 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court