Santosh And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ANR




    
     

 Date of decision: 28th April, 2016 Santosh and others  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another  Respondents     !"  #
  #


Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 #
$% "& Report dated 09.03.2016 of learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Division).cum.SDJM, Tosham has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Chhoto Devi and the accused persons namely Santosh, Ajit, Partap Singh and Prabhu Ram, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure property dispute, the fact that parties belong to the same very area and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.05.06 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   parties and in view of the law laid down in '()*#(*+,-#.)./ 

0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4! 

%&   %4(5(*)6&  and '7068(*3/4 #(*+, )*3 .,/49 - #.)./   0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4! 

: %&   %4(5(*)6&

$ the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.456 dated 21.11.2015 registered at Police Station Tosham, District Bhiwani under Sections 420/467/468/471 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

%  #
&   ;4(6$


  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.05.06 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court