Sonika And Another v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Writ Petition No. 11082 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : July 31, 2020 Sonika and another ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Perdhuman Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) The matter has been taken up through Videoconferencing on account of outbreak of pandemic COVID-19. The present petition which is by way of civil writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus against the respondents for deciding the representation/legal notices dated 15.11.2019 and 15.5.2020, Annexures P/4 and P/7.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Ravinder Dhull, Addl. AG Haryana accepts notice and puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents. Upon hearing counsel for the parties and perusal of record, the present petition stands disposed of with the directions to DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2020.08.07 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Civil Writ Petition No. 11082 of 2020 (O&M) -2the respondents to consider aforesaid representation/legal notice and dispose if off by passing speaking orders in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the receipt of copy of this order.

Disposed of.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) July 31, 2020 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2020.08.07 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.