Rahul Gupta v. Sheena Gupta

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH 127+225 CR-2687-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.07.2024 RAHUL GUPTA .... Petitioner

VERSUS

SHEENA GUPTA .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Petitioner present in Court with his counsel Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shivya Sehgal, Advocate and Ms. Sanjana, Advocate.

Respondent present in Court with her counsel Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saksham Mahajan, Advocate Mr. Anmol Puri, Advocate and Ms. Rabani Attri, Advocate.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 06.04.2024 (Annexure P-12) passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ludhiana.

2.

Learned senior counsel for both the parties, on instructions from their respective instructing counsel, are ad idem that the matter is fixed before the Family Court concerned on 01st August 2024. The documents, as directed by the Family Court concerned, had been handed over by the respondent to the counsel for the petitioner before the Family Court concerned. The documents which the petitioner was to hand over to the AMAN JAIN 2024.07.26 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

127+225 CR-2687-2024 (O&M) -2respondent, as directed by the Family Court concerned, have not been handed over till date.

3.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner (who is present in person), undertakes to hand over the requisite documents to the counsel for the respondent on or before 29th July 2024.

4.

Both the senior counsel are ad idem that before the Family Court concerned no further adjournment shall be sought and that the impugned order may be set aside and the Family Court concerned would decide the application for interim maintenance in accordance with the law after considering the documents produced by both the parties. 5.

In view of the above, the impugned order dated 06.04.2024 is set aside and the Family Court concerned shall decide the application for interim maintenance afresh in accordance with the law after considering the documents to be produced by both the parties. 6.

It is made clear that in case the documents, as directed by the Family Court concerned and as undertaken by the petitioner today, are not handed over to the respondent on or before 29.07.2024, the present petition shall be deemed to having been dismissed.

7.

Disposed off in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

25.07.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2024.07.26 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document