Ramesh Walia v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-43107 of 2014 Date of decision: 08.01.2016 Ramesh Walia ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ..Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? Yes/No
2. To be referred to reporters or not? Yes/No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No
Present:
Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State.
Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for Mr. R.P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for the complainant.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Neeraj Kumar submits that the recovery is to be effected from the co-accused-husband and the petitioner is no more required at this stage. Accordingly, interim order dated 17.12.2014 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
08.01.2016 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE NEETU RANI 2016.01.12 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh