Jaj Jeet Singh @ Jaj v. State Of Punjab




    
      Date of decision: 29th April, 2015  Jaj Jeet Singh @ Jaj

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

Respondent        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Lajpat Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab with ASI Satpal, Police Station Patran.

Paviterdeep Singh, Complainant in person.

 
!"

# Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.192 dated 26.08.2010 registered at Police Station Patran, District Patiala under Sections 307, 341, 506, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.30 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court





Vide order dated 17.12.2014 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Satpal from Police Station Patran, submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and recovery of a revolver has already been effected from him and that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute.

In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 17.12.2014 is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off.

"

 
#   $%&'(!)  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.30 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court