Krishana Kumari v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44021 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION:-07.01.2019 KRISHANA KUMARI ...PETITIONER...

V.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

...RESPONDENTS...

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

Present:

Mr. Atinder Pal SIngh, Advocate for Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. ASI Malkiat Singh along with Mr. P.K. Garg, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Service complete.

Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate has appeared and filed memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No.2. The same is taken on record. Be tagged at appropriate place.

Learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous in view of the fact that cancellation report has been prepared in this case and the same shall be filed in the court within two weeks positively.

Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 07.01.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No whether reportable:

Yes/No SONIKA 2019.01.08 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh