Mandeep v. State Of Haryana


CRM-M-44072-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44072-2018 Date of Decision: 30.10.2018 Mandeep ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr. Nihul Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.



 INDERJIT SINGH, J. (Oral)     

 





438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, 'Cr.P.C.') for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.292 dated 12.06.2018, registered at Police Station Sector 10, District Gurugram, under Sections 379-A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Notice of motion was issued in this case. Learned State counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and gone through the record. As per the allegations, Pankaj alongwith Akash, Mandeep snatched mobile phone and
7,000/- from the complainant. Pankaj was PARVEEN KUMAR 2018.10.30 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh


CRM-M-44072-2018 apprehended at the spot. During investigation, Pankaj named the present petitioner.

Learned State counsel has brought to the notice of this Court that there are two other FIRs registered against the present petitioner regarding such type of offence.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; nature and gravity of the offence and in view of the facts that the petitioner is required for custodial interrogation and recovery is to be effected from him also, I do not find it a fit case where the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.


 

  



      Note:

!





 "# 

 $%  !





&

 $ ' PARVEEN KUMAR 2018.10.30 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh