Sham Lal v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43138 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- December 15, 2017 Sham Lal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab.

*** Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has since joined the investigation and furnished an affidavit that he does not hold any Passport and in that way he is not required by the police for further investigation. He has stated so on instructions from ASI Rajesh Kumar from Police Station Navi Baradari, Jalandhar.

Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 15.11.2017 is made absolute, subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands allowed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE December 15, 2017 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2017.12.15 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh