Chanchal v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 207/A ***** CRM-M No. 23917 of 2022 Date of Decision : 22.2.2023 Chanchal ..... Petitioner versus State of Punjab ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

Present:

Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Jashandeep Singh, AAG. Punjab Mr. M.S. Saini, Advocate, for the complainant --- TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL):

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is not in dispute that pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 27.5.2022, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sanjay Kumar, contends that certain dowry articles are yet to be recovered from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner by referring to the recovery memo dated 1.6.2022 states that the alleged dowry articles already stands recovered from the petitioner.

In view thereof, the petition is allowed. Interim order dated 27.5.2022, passed by this Court, is made absolute. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 22.2.2023 Ashwani Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2023.02.24 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document