Sanjay Sehgal And ANR v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-5994 of 2013 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-5994 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.8.2015.

Sanjay Sehgal and another .......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. S.S.Narula, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. R.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.S.Chahal, Advocate for the complainant.

**** SABINA, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 34 dated 9.3.2012 under Section 420, 465, 468, 471, 474, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station City Kharar, District Mohali.

Heard.

Vide order dated 3.5.2013, arrest of the petitioners was stayed.

Today, learned State counsel has placed on record affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kharar wherein it has been stated that the petitioners have joined investigation and their custody was not required as all the facts were already on record and the investigation of the case was already complete. In view of the said affidavit, this petition is allowed. In the event of arrest, petitioners be released on bail GURPREET SINGH 2015.08.25 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-5994 of 2013 (O&M) -2subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. Petitioners shall join investigation as and when required by the police and shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court. (SABINA) JUDGE August 24, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.08.25 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh