Sunil v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20859-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.04.2026 Sunil ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. Siddharth Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravneet Singh Lekhi, AAG Punjab ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned State counsel states that the charges have not been framed and complainant, in such a case of embezzlement of Rs.2 crores, requires to be examined, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition at this stage. 2.

Ordered accordingly.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 23.04.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No MOHIT 2026.04.23 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document