Bikramjit Singh Alias Vicky v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....

Criminal Misc. No.M-44224 of 2018 Date of decision:31.10.2018 Bikramjit Singh alias Vicky

...Petitioner

v.

State of Punjab

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Sharda, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.75 dated 27.6.2018 registered for the offences under Sections 452, 326, 324, 323, 379, 148 and 149 IPC at Police Station Jhabal, District Tarn Taran.

Notice of motion has been issued in this case. Mr. Pawan Sharda, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has appeared on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that the petitioner is stated to be armed HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.11.01 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-44224 of 2018 [2] with a `Datar'. He caused two injuries on the head of Amrik Singh father of the complainant from the blunt side. Injury No.2 on the head is attributed to him, which is a grievous injury.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the petitioner was armed with a deadly weapon and caused grievous injury on the vital part of the body of Amrik Singh, I do not find it a fit case where the petitioner is entitled for the grant of anticipatory bail. Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed.

October 31, 2018.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.11.01 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh