Rajeev Bakshi Another v. Alm Infotech City Pvt Ltd

ARB-212-2024 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 110+296 (02 Cases) ARB-212-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.09.2024 RAJEEV BAKSHI AND ANOTHER .... APPLICANTS V/S ALM INFOTECH CITY PVT LTD .... RESPONDENT 2.

ARB-213-2024 (O&M) RAJEEV BAKSHI .... APPLICANT V/S ALM INFOTECH CITY PVT LTD .... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Reshabh Bajaj, Advocate for the applicant (s).

Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate Mr. Vishal Saini, Advocate for the respondent.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

Mr. Rajat Khanna, counsel for the respondent submits that respondent is not disputing the amount demanded by applicants, however, they should raise invoice so that payment may be properly accounted for.

Anju Goel 2024.09.26 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

ARB-212-2024 (O&M) 2.

Faced with this, Mr.Reshabh Bajaj, Advocate submits that applicants would issue invoice within two weeks from today and respondent may be directed to make payment in a time bound manner. 3.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the applications stand disposed of with a direction to respondent to make payment within 04 weeks from the date of receipt of invoice.

4.

Pending miscellaneous application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

25.09.2024 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) anju JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Anju Goel 2024.09.26 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh