Jai Naryaan v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43237 of 2015 Date of Decision: 21.12.2015 Jai Narayan .....Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Ms. Sharmila Sharma , Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of the respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking appropriate direction.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the genuine grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed by the respondent authorities, he finally approached the Superintendent of Police, Sonepat-respondent No.2 by way of representation dated 8.7.2015 (Annexure P-1), but the same is also pending decision. She further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case the Superintendent of Police, Sonepat-respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide his representation, within a reasonable time. AMIT KUMAR 2015.12.21 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-43237 of 2015 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the rights of either of the parties, the Superintendent of Police, Sonepat-respondent No.2 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide his representation dated 8.7.2015 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same, at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, present petition stands disposed of.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 21.12.2015 Ak Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2015.12.21 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document