Satish Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Another
CRM-M-25260-2022
! "
"# SATISH KUMAR
$ %&$ '( ' ) ***** !
"#$"!# "!
%& '
(!)
* '
$"!#"!
& '
(! )
"
'+$"!#"!
&
,*!
%!
!
-" "+ !, +&./!, $ # , )
"
00000 ( ' )+ , -./ The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR No. 771 dated 07.12.2020 registered under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 as the main complaint case No. NI ACT-3759 of 2013 titled as 'M/s Balaji Trading Company versus M/s Radhe Traders' has already been withdrawn on the basis of compromise vide order dated 10.03.2021.
Reply by way of affidavit submitted by Vir Singh, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, City Karnal has been filed on behalf of respondent No.1 and the same is taken on record.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the matter has already been resolved amongst the parties as the main complaint VISHAL SHARMA 2025.09.10 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
$0$0"#"1 0"
""
case No. NI ACT-3759 of 2013 titled as 'M/s Balaji Trading Company versus M/s Radhe Traders' has already been withdrawn on the basis of compromise vide order dated 10.03.2021 (Annexure P-4). There is no representation on behalf of the respondent. -" "+ !, +& '
(!& - , 1111 12& 3"
$ # !
!./!, $ # , to assist this Court on behalf of the respondent. Copy of the paper book has been handed over to him in the Court today. After perusal of the case file, learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 does not dispute the factum of compromise effected between the parties.
' 3 ) " !- '& "
!,, 3 !
" !)
!
4 55 ! 6566 / #
(
57 ) " 4
!
!, $
& 86 ! , ( !
$ % 9!
!, !
!,, " (
:# !,
(
/!
/" )
!
" -%:#!" #-;( !% )( ) - -%"
3 ""
!!"#$ %&'% ! '
()% *
&+,
'
- !$ &- .
- 3 "
!
) 3
" )
( )( ) ( % )"
Petition is allowed.
,( ' )/ ' $ +"
"# <"" !+ /= !
= <""
!-,
= VISHAL SHARMA 2025.09.10 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document