Sachin Bansal v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRM-M-43377-2014 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43377-2014 Date of decision: 13.3.2015 Sachin Bansal ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH PRESENT: Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

R.P. NAGRATH, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of a direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to decide the representation Annexure P-3 moved by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that M/s Keshav Oil and Cotton Ginning Industries Private Limited, filed a Civil Suit No. 1 of 2014 on 25.2.2014 which is pending before the learned Additional District Judge, Hisar. That suit was filed for permanent and mandatory injunction with a prayer to restrain defendant (petitioner herein) from passing of the trade mark and trade name of the plaintiff-company and the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) for grant of temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff-M/s Keshav Oil and Cotton Ginning Industries Private RISHU KATARIA 2015.03.16 13:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-43377-2014 -2Limited was dismissed by the Additional District Judge, Hisar on 11.4.2014.

Response to the instant petition filed by the respondents was that action is not being initiated due to pendency of above-stated civil suit.

In view of the limited prayer made in the instant petition, the instant petition is disposed to with a direction to the respondents to look into the allegations contained in representation Annexure P-3 already moved by the petitioner and if warranted, take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

March 13, 2015 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) rishu JUDGE RISHU KATARIA 2015.03.16 13:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document