Bodh Raj v. State Of Punjab & ANR




    
    

 Date of decision: 19th May, 2015  Bodh Raj  Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another  Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab.

 "
#$ !% Report dated 15.04.2015 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurdaspur has been received on the basis of statements of accused/petitioner Bodh Raj and complainant Vijay Kumar whereby the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise effected between the parties is an outcome of voluntariness, free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same area and the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.19 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and in bringing about peace and harmony and for the betterment of their future lives, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.198 dated 03.12.2014 registered at Police Station City Gurdaspur under Sections 324/323/341/34 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

$  "
%   &' (#


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.19 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court