Jagsir Singh v. State Of Punjab And ANR.

CRM-M No. 44264 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 44264 of 2016 DATE OF DECISION :- August 02, 2018 Jagsir Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate for Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. G.N. Mali, Advocate for respondent no. 2. *** Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2 states that as per his instructions, petitioner has made payment to the complainant in terms of settlement, inasmuch as a sum of Rs.50,000/- has been paid by him to the complainant. He states that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, he does not oppose the instant petition for grant of pre arrest bail to petitioner Jagsir Singh.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Jagdev Singh states that since the matter has been compromised between the parties and the petitioner has joined the investigation, he is not required by the local police for further investigation.

PARVINDER SINGH 2018.08.03 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 44264 of 2016 Under such circumstances, the petition is accepted and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in this case, he be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting officer subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE August 02, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2018.08.03 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh