Nirmal Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RFA No. 4233 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.08.2022 Nirmal Singh ...Appellant(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

Mr. Shailendra Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Satyendra Chauhan, Advocate Mr. J.S. Thind, Advocate Mr. Shubham, Advocate Mr. P.K. Ganga, Advocate Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. Dheeraj Narula, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Punchi, Advocate Mr. K.S. Godara, Advocate Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate Mr. C.L. Premy, Advocate Ms. Amarjit Kaur, Advocate and Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the landowners.

Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana.

***** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J.

CM No.10780-CI-2019 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 382 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. CM No.10781-CI-2019 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 40 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM No.10782-CI-2019 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

SANGEETA 2022.10.28 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

RFA No. 4233 of 2019 (O&M) -2Main case For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA No.2349 of 2018, titled as Natha Singh V s. State of Haryana and others .

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed.

31.08.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) sangeeta JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes Whether reportable?

No SANGEETA 2022.10.28 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment