Fakruddin v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-20929 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 16, 2019 Fakruddin

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Arjun Attri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Chetan Sharma, AAG Haryana, for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.34 dated 15.02.2019 under Sections 3/13(1), 8/13(3) of the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, registered at Police Station Nagina, District Mewat. Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. It has been brought to the notice of this Court by learned State counsel that there are three more FIRs against the present petitioner for the same offence. As per prosecution version, a huge quantity of beef was VINEET GULATI 2019.07.18 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-20929 of 2019 -2recovered from the petitioner.

Keeping in view the conduct of the petitioner that he is repeating the offence and he being the main accused, I do not find it a fit case where petitioner is entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

July 16, 2019 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2019.07.18 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh