Ravi Kumar Alias Ravi v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.26377 of 2021 Date of Decision: November 09, 2021 Ravi Kumar @ Ravi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present:- None for the petitioner.

Mr. Rana Harjasdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab.

*** Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral) By this petition, filed under the provisions of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioners seek the concession of anticipatory bail, upon FIR No.43, dated 22.04.2021, having been registered at Police Station Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 148, 149 and 506 of the IPC.

Though, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present today, pursuant to the order dated 16.07.2021 passed by this court, learned State counsel, on instructions from S.I. Subhash Chander, submits that the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required.

That being so, without making any comment on the actual merits of the case, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.

SARITA RANI 2021.11.13 16:17 I attest to the accuracy of this order

CRM-M No.26377 of 2021 - 2 - However, if the petitioners' custodial interrogation is required at any stage hereinafter, in the context of the FIR in question, he would be given 10 days notice before arrest, duly shown to be served upon them. Naturally, if the complainant is aggrieved in any manner, of lack of proper investigation, he/she would be always at liberty to avail of his/her remedy as per law.

November 09, 2021 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes   



 
SARITA RANI 2021.11.13 16:17 I attest to the accuracy of this order