Balwinder Singh Patwari v. State Of Punjab And ANR.

CRM-M-6481-2013 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6481-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 4, 2016 Balwinder Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.

Mr. Manish Prabhakar, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents are in unison that after filing of the charge-sheet (challan), the charges were PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.05 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-6481-2013 (O&M) framed by learned Trial Court in the year 2013. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to challenge the order of framing of charges. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the order framing the charges is challenged by the petitioner before the Court of Session by way of a criminal revision petition, alongwith an application for condonation of delay, within fifteen days of passing of the present order, the said application for condonation of delay shall be decided keeping in view the fact that the petitioner had approached this Court by way of present petition.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE February 4, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.05 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document