Neeru Bala And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 12038 of 2022 Date of Decision: 30.05.2022 Neeru Bala and Others ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. .D.S.Matya, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The writ petition filed by the petitioners is bereft of necessary particulars. The petitioners pray for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to release the amount of compensation for the land acquisition.

2.

The acquisition is stated to be under the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1956 Act"). Neither the date of award, as envisaged under the 1956 Act, has been disclosed nor the Union of India or the National Highways Authority has been made party to the writ petition.

3.

In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 30, 2022 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.06.02 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document