Neeraj Kochhar And ANR v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ANR




    
       Date of decision: 4th August, 2015  Neeraj Kochhar and another

Petitioners

Versus

UT Chandigarh and another

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Amandeep S. Gill, APP UT Chandigarh for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ In the light of report dated 04.07.2014 sent by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh that the parties have failed to put in appearance in compliance of the orders passed by this Court and even on earlier occasions in spite of similar orders having been procured parties have scant regard for the same. Even today none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners as well as private respondent.

Dismissed for non prosecution.

#  !
$   %&%'("  )
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.05 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court