Bhagwat And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ANR




    
    

 ! Date of decision: 29th April, 2016 Bhagwat and others

Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another

Respondents  "  #$  %
  %


Present:

Mr. Ravi Gakhar, Advocate for Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr. S.K. Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.2.

 %
& $! Report dated 29.09.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Mange Ram and the accused persons namely Bhagwat, Jagat, Happy and Ranbir, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very village and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.05.06 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in '()* %(*+, - %.)./  0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4# 

!   4(5(*)6!  and '7068(*3/4 %(*+, )*3 .,/49 - %.)./  0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4# 

 !   4(5(*)6!

& the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.226 dated 05.08.2011 registered at Police Station Surajkund, District Faridabad under Sections 148/149/232/447/506/511 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

 %
!   :4(6;&

<
  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.05.06 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court