Jiwan Singh @ Jagjeewan Singh v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-44658 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 31, 2017 Jiwan Singh alias Jagjeewan Singh
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present:
Mr.Kewal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Deep Singh, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.
**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.58 dated 12.07.2016 under Sections 420, 120-B IPC and Section 24 of the Immigration Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Raikot, District Ludhiana. Notice of motion was issued and learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner being attorney of his brother Hari Singh had filed a complaint, copy of which is Annexure P-2 against son-in-law of present complainant Sarwan Singh and present false FIR has been got registered by the complainant due to that reason.
Vineet Gulati 2017.02.01 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CRM No.M-44658 of 2016 -2I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that the petitioner has already joined the investigation. He is not required for any custodial interrogation or investigation. Nothing is to be recovered from him. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by sending the petitioner to custody till the disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case, where the petitioner is entitled to benefit of grant of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the present petition is accepted and the order dated 15.12.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute. January 31, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.02.01 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh