Atul Amit v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-20960-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-20960-2025 Date of Decision : 29.10.2025 ATUL AMIT

...Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY

Present:

Mr. V. B. Godara, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana.

**** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (ORAL) 1.

This is the petition for grant of bail under Section 483 BNSS (old Section 439 Cr.P.C.), filed by petitioner, an accused in case bearing FIR No.947 dated 05.08.2022 registered against him at Police Station Sadar Hisar, District Hisar, for the commission of offences punishable u/s 302, 201, 34 IPC. 2.

Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of complainant in Court today which is taken on record. 3.

Status Report dated 25.10.2025 by way of affidavit of Mr. Kamaljeet Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, H.Q., Hisar, has been filed on behalf of the respondent-State, which is taken on record. 4.

Learned counsel for the State submits that as many as 19 witnesses have been examined.

5.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that directions be given to the trial Court to decide the case in a time bound manner. Sonia Puri 2025.10.31 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-20960-2025 -26.

Learned State counsel and also learned counsel for the complainant, do not oppose the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 7.

Heard.

8.

In view of the limited request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to learned trial Court to make earnest efforts to conclude the trial expeditiously, in accordance with law preferably within a period of 04 months, after the receipt of certified copy of this order. (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) JUDGE 29.10.2025 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sonia Puri 2025.10.31 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document