Jasbir Singh & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ANR

CRM-M-4402-2014 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4402-2014 Date of Decision: December 24, 2015 Jasbir Singh and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Iqbal Singh Saggu, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Pawan Gaur, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.R.S.Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.2.

.......

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has come to know that now the charges have been framed, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to challenge the order of framing of charges by way of criminal revision petition, in accordance with law. MEENU 2015.12.24 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-4402-2014 -2Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel representing the private respondent has no objection to the above prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioners. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioners challenge the order of framing of charges by way of revision petition along with an application for condonation of delay within three weeks of passing of this order, the application for condonation of delay shall be decided keeping in view the fact that the petitioners had approached this Court. December 24, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.12.24 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh