Sanjeev Agarwal And ANR v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 233 (1) CRR-2630-2011 Date of Decision: 06.05.2022 Sanjeev Agarwal and another ......... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has been settled in the Lok Adalat between the parties and the petitioners have undergone the sentence of 01 month and 08 days. He on instructions submits that he would be confining his prayer to reduction of sentence that has already been undergone and would not press appeal on merits. The sentence be reduced to period already undergone. Given fact that the matter stands compromised in the Lok Adalat wherein petitioners had paid a penalty amount to the tune of Rs. 35 lakh and the fact that they have already undergone 01 month and 08 days, the prayer is allowed and the sentence is reduced to already undergone.

The revision petition is partly allowed to the extent mentioned above. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 06.05.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.05.09 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document