← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/44883/2016allowed

Dinesh Singh Dhillon v. State Of Haryana

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Satpal2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-44883 of 2016 [ 1 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-44883 of 2016 Date of Decision : November 09, 2017 Dinesh Singh Dhillon .......................................................Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana............................................................ Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL ...

Present:

Mr. G.P.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. N.S.Shekhawat, Advocate for the complainant.

...

LISA GILL, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 547 dated 11.11.2016 under Sections 323/498-A/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Badshahpur, District Gurgaon. The matter has been amicably resolved between the parties before the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court on 04.05.2017. Modification in the said Agreement is noted by this Court on 27.07.2017. It is informed that petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been filed. Statements of the parties at first motion have since been recorded.

Learned counsel for the complainant submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties she has no objection in case this Rupinder Kaur 2017.11.10 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-44883 of 2016 [ 2 ] petition is allowed subject to strict adherence to the terms and conditions of settlement by the petitioner.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the settlement between the parties but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is considered just and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Investigating/Arresting Officer. Petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

However, liberty is afforded to the complainant to move appropriate application in case the terms and conditions of settlement between the parties are not adhered to by the petitioner. ( LISA GILL ) 09.11.2017 JUDGE rupi Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable:

Yes / No Rupinder Kaur 2017.11.10 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document