Shweta v. Akash

TA-583-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.237 TA-583-2024 Date of Decision: 19.03.2025 SHWETA ....Applicant

Versus

AKASH .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Suryakant Gautam, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
 

 

    

             

 

 !  
  

"#  

" !

    $%#& !'((    % 

&  % 

(   ) 

*    !  

%    

 +!     

"%     

   #       ! ! 

  %  ,     

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 26.05.2021, but no child Sonu 2025.03.19 18:04 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC

TA-583-2024 was born from the said wedlock. Also, it is submitted that the applicant is not working and as such, has no source of earning. Even, she has filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., which is pending in the Courts at Rohtak.

On the contrary, the counsel for the respondent submits that the distance between Jhajjar and Rohtak is only 34 kilometres, which fact is not controverted by the counsel for the applicant. Also, it is submitted that the applicant is a post-graduate.

In view of the submissions aforesaid, it is pertinent to mention that even though, no document relating to the educational input of the applicant, is coming on record, but however, the distance is a major factor to be seen, which is only 34 kilometres. Also, there is no child born from the said wedlock.

In view of the aforesaid fact situation and also considering the well-established network of transportation, existing in the present time, no case is made out for transfer of the divorce petition. Hence, the transfer application is hereby dismissed. (ARCHANA PURI) 19.03.2025 JUDGE Sonu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.03.19 18:04 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC