S K Tindwal And Others v. Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board

-1CWP-11311 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11311 of 2020 Date of Decision: 06.08.2020 S.K. Tindwal and others

...Petitioners

Versus

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate, for the respondent. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing due to pandemic Covid-19.

Through this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to re-calculate retiral benefits of the petitioners in the light of scheme/policy dated 07.01.2002 (Annexure P-1). Notice of motion.

Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate,, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the purpose would be achieved if the respondent is directed to decide legal notice dated 08.03.2020 (Annexure P-14) in a time-bound manner. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after RAVINDER SINGH 2020.08.06 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CWP-11311 of 2020 perusing the paper-book, but without commenting on merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide legal notice dated 08.03.2020 (Annexure P-14) by passing a speaking order within a period of two month from today, failing which petitioners shall be entitled to file contempt petition.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) August 06, 2020 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.08.06 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document