Gagandeep Singh @ Gagan v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M-45009-2018 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-45009-2018 Date of Decision: 08.05.2019 Gagandeep Singh @ Gagan .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - None for the petitioner.

Mr. AS Gill, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. PS Bedi, Advocate for Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for respondent No. 1. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Barjinder Singh, Assistant Commissioner of Police (West), Jalandhar, filed by learned State counsel is taken on record. Be tagged at the appropriate place. Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioner has gone un-represented.

Perusal of the file shows that on the previous date also i.e. 15.12.2018, the petitioner had gone un-represented. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the instant petition. More so, learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that petitioner has again been declared as proclaimed offender.

RISHU KATARIA 2019.05.13 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-45009-2018 -2In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed on the following two counts:- (i) for want of prosecution; and (ii) as having been rendered infructuous.

May 08, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2019.05.13 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document