Gian Kaur & ORS v. State Of Punjab Etc.




    
      Date of decision: 20th April, 2015  Gian Kaur and others  Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others  Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Abhishek Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. A.P.S. Gill, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3 and 5.

Mr. A.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondents No.6 & 7.

 
!"

# Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as respondents Mr. Abhishek Singla and Mr. A.S. Dhaliwal have concurred that parties have effected compromise, in the light of which present matter has become infructuous.

Dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

However, petitioners are at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court in case need so arises in future. "

 
#   $%&' ! (
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.21 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court