Krishan Alias Pada v. State Of Haryana
!" "#$%$ &
'
'''''"!$!$ &"( '''''"%) &*"&!
+ ,'-- ,
! """""
# $ &'( )*
+++, -./01.1
2
3-3
4 5 6
%2 % 2
%2
7 8 % -
#
9 % % &'( 2 %
2
/
!
! Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has produced the copy of the custody certificate, which is taken on record and he prays for dismissal of the instant petition stating that the petitioner is a habitual offender as is involved in multiple other cases. However, there is no dispute on behalf of the State to the fact that it is a case of no injury and only
recovery as has been alleged against the petitioner is 8 % -
and no case under Section -./01.1
2
3-3 % 2 As far as the details of other cases are concerned, in FIR No.17 dated 10.02.2015, the petitioner had been released on bail, vide order dated 24.04.2023 and another two FIRs i.e. FIR No.85 of 2018 and FIR No.16 of 2015, he stands acquitted.
Be that as it may, having gone through the custody certificate, the petitioner has suffered incarceration of 03 months and 29 days and considering the fact that investigation is complete, +:+8+, 9 % ;2 9 4 9 $ 2 o 9 % % $ % % 9 7 ;
9
;
4 % 2
% 4 9 7 2
;
4
!
" #$%&# '(%)%
2
% 4 4(//-3,/+ .
/0$&*"(-$&12 /$ % #34%'-! !" 5&0 67 ++8+8 9 9
4 4
% 2 %
2 % $ % 2 2 <
% $
8
9 %
% % 4=5
# % 9
9 2
% %
; 2
9- ,:
' > $ = ?=) > % ?=)