Sukhchain Alias Sukhle v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-19840-2026 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.226 CRM-M-19840-2026 Decided on : 22.05.2026 Sukhchain @ Sukhle ...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present :
Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.
*** , J (ORAL)
!"#$ %
&
$
'
(
%&
') '
* ))
%
&
("+ ),- .
. .
-
.
- -/
!"#
CRM-M-19840-2026 2 0
-
1
- .
0
contends that mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act were not complied with at the time of alleged search and seizure. She further contends that the recovery of alleged contraband has already been effected from the petitioner and nothing more is recovered from him. Learned counsel contends that the recovered quantity is non-commercial in nature. 2
%
& 1
- 3
3
1 - & .
4- /
-
. - . 1
2
1 . 0
.
.
/ 1 -
-
--
/
-
11 -
- -
/1
1
-
-
31
- 5
3
1
- 3
3 1 -3 &
4-
-
CRM-M-19840-2026 3
- . 1
/
.
. 1 1
(
6
"
# )-
/ 7 (46
-
1
-
-
( 6
"
(
-
11
8 - - 9 :
)-
/ ; -6 !" !
# $
.
-
.
)
11
8
9 :2 1
)-
< .=<
!
!
!
"
1 .
1
.
CRM-M-19840-2026 4
6 8' +
86*+ "
4
-
--
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No >
=? 8