Sunil Kumar v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH (208) CRM-M-22198 of 2020 Date of Decision : 14.08.2020 Sunil Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
(Through video conferencing)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present:
Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate and Mr. Govind Chuahan, Advocate for the complainant.
*** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the filing of the present petition, certain more sections of IPC have been added in the FIR, which needed to be incorporated in the petition and, therefore, he be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one after adding the said Sections of IPC.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. August 14, 2020 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2020.08.14 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh