Prince v. State Of Punjab
!"! #! $%&'()&*+,+'-.#/#0
7' 5 '
2
!
"
" +, ,
, * *
# $ % & & ' ( :1 %
)* +, , ,- , ./ 8 9 *0* *00 0 *)0 12
323 ,+ $ " 4 $ %5
"
3 *+ ,6 ,
5 5
!
" # $ % &'($ )
* +! ,4 -
.
. .. ).'
//!
# 01
# $ 2
0
3
0
0
2
2
2 2
% %2
4 2
0
3
0
5 5 2
2 ! , 4 2
% 6
2
%
02
%
7 2
%%
'
0
6
3
2
2
0
%
0 0
5 !
%
0 +! , 4 - -
7 %2 2
6
2 2
2
07 00
0
!
2
8 0
0 0 0 6
9
3
8 ) 52%
6 0
(
94
2
1
3 % !
# $ :
0
4
0
; * ;
" <
"" 5
"
""
!
2
2
"
1
'
5 5.
Th his Court in the judgment passed d in Major Singh @ Major Vs.
; 2023 (2) Law Herald 1506 has s State of Punjab b 2023 (3) RCR (Criminal) 406;
held that the Co ourt is first required to record it s satisfaction before issuance of f process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. and non-rec cording of the satisfaction itself f makes such ord der suffering from incurable illeg gality. The conditions specified d in Section 82
(2) Cr.P.C. for the publication n of a proclamation against an n absconder are m mandatory. Any non-complianc ce therewith cannot be cured as s an 'irregularity y' and renders the proclamatio on and proceedings subsequent t thereto a nullity y.
1 '5
"
" +, ,
, * * ./8 9 9' 5
5
"
!
)
2 5
, 5 < "
"
5
+,,,,=8
5
> : 1 ?2
5 "
2
1
" 5 2
" '
-
"
"
" ""
2 7 2 5 '
"
123.4#0 0
(i) .9
> <= @=% @=% >