Ravi v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-27393 of 2021 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27393 of 2021 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- May 02, 2022 Ravi
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana.
*** CRM No. 14844 of 2022 This is an application for addition of Section 201 of IPC in the head note as well prayer clause of the main petition. Heard.
The application is not opposed, therefore, the same is allowed. The amended head note so filed by the petitioner be taken on record. CRM-M-27393 of 2021 Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ramesh Kumar has stated that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and has been released on interim bail. He has contended that the local police does not require arrest of the petitioner in the case in question and in case if at any stage of investigation, petitioner is required to be arrested by the local police then four days advance notice would be given to him. It being so, the present petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly with the observations that in view of statement of PARVINDER SINGH 2022.05.02 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-27393 of 2021 (O&M) learned State counsel if at any stage of investigation the petitioner is required to be arrested by the police in this case then four days advance notice would be given to him.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE May 02, 2022 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2022.05.02 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document