Rubiya Parveen And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CRM-M-7231-2013 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-7231-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 08, 2016 Mrs.Rubiya Parveen and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Arun Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Apoorv Garg, AAG, Haryana.

Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for respondent No.2.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioners to take all the pleas before the Court below in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the above prayer.

MEENU 2016.02.08 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-7231-2013 (O&M) -2Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. It is made clear that learned Courts below shall not be influenced by the fact that the petitioners had approached this Court by way of present petition.

February 08, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.02.08 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh